The model I would use for the case study is the Scriven
approach. The Scriven approach focuses
on goals and outcomes of a program. It
also focuses on looking at the reasons for the program and identifying the
motivation of those involved. I felt
this approach would be most beneficial as it would allow the evaluator to look
at a few key components of the program.
Firstly, it would be important to look at what the intended goals of the
fitness program were before it began.
There is not a lot of information provided on what the program was
hoping to achieve. There were general
and very broad goals but no expectations for numbers of participants or goals
for achievement. This approach would
help to identify if the program was meeting its goals by clearly laying out
what they were hoping to achieve. At
first glance, the number of participants would indicate that the program was
very unsuccessful based on what numbers they were hoping to participate. Unfortunately, we don’t really know those
numbers and what methods were used to advertise the program. Perhaps this could have been an initial flaw
for the program. Secondly, there are no
fitness goals to be able to correlate to decreased chance of developing
diabetes. It’s hard to meet a goal and
project an outcome, from a medical point of view, if there isn’t information to
identify what fitness accomplishments would increase the chances of less
acquired diabetes cases.
I also felt that the motivation of all people involved would
be an interesting concept to investigate.
There is no mention of who decided this program was needed and who
agreed to develop and run the program.
Part of the success of establishing a program of this nature is
identifying the need for the participants involved and having motivated staff
to implement the instruction and guidance.
If the participants didn’t find the exercise, nutrition, and education
on diabetes valuable to them then they would be very unmotivated to follow through
with the program. I would not include
this information in an evaluation, but it seems as though someone else decided this
program was necessary and did not poll or survey aboriginal women to decide if
this was a program that is needed or would be utilized by the intended
participants if created. It seems like
the need by participants should have been the guiding influence on the creation
of this program. In addition, if staff
members, who likely already have enough work to handle, are “forced” to
implement a program that they don’t believe in or wish to participate in then
the entire morale and motivation from the staff would influence the
participants.
This model seems to be the most appropriate for deciphering the
intended goals and objectives of the program and following them through to see
if they meet the outcomes. By carefully
investigating the goals, outcomes, and role motivation, using the Scriven method,
an evaluation would be able to efficiently outline the positives and negatives
of this particular program.
Thanks Kris for sharing your thoughts. You choose an appropriate approach and apply it logically.
ReplyDeleteJay